|
|
Back to
Exhibit 7
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
DOCKET NO. 02-1226:
In docket
No.02-1226, the defendant is challenging a conviction for second degree
burglary, San Bernardino County Superior Court case No. FWV-02836, in
which defendant was manipulated by defense counsel in a related case, to
enter an unintelligently made and unknowingly guilty plea. He plead
guilty and was sentenced on March 15th, 1994, to a term of
180 days in county jail and 36 months probation. The defendant has
served his sentence on this case, but has “present need” to challenge
and overturn it since it is currently being used as a “prior” to
aggravate 4 Colorado criminal cases the defendant recently overturned on
7-12-01.
DOCKET NO. 02-1225:
In docket
No.02-1225, the defendant is challenging a conviction for two counts of
second degree robbery and two counts of false imprisonment, San
Bernardino County Superior Court case No.FVA-06241, in which the
defendant was coerced through police initiated starvation, inhumane
confinement in the jail, and perpetual lockdown isolation to enter an
involuntary guilty plea in this case to flee the abuse in the jail. The
prosecutor also used illegal Ex-Post Facto applications to aggravate the
penalties in this case. And this conviction was also obtained due to
ineffective assistance of counsel, and was obtained in violation of the
defendant’s 6th Amendment right to a speedy trial under the
I.A.D. act. The defendant entered the coerced plea on 12-29-98.
DOCKET NO. 02-1155:
In docket
No.02-1155, the defendant is challenging a conviction for Escape without
force, San Bernardino County Superior Court case No. FVA-10530, in which
on 12-29-98, the defendant was coerced through police induced
starvation, inhumane confinement in the jail, and perpetual lockdown
isolation to enter an involuntary plea in this case to flee the
mistreatment in the jail. The prosecutor also used illegal Ex-Post Facto
applications from out of state cases, to aggravate the penalties in this
case. Thus, this also equated to ineffective Assistance of counsel on
the part of the defendant’s court appointed defense attorney.
|
|